Everybody Poops: The Post-Mortem Edition

After a person has been declared clinically dead and biological death occurs, long after our sentient personality has left this world, certain bodily functions just keep on keepin’ on. Old habits die hard, and in the case of the human body, some habits won’t die just because you do.

1. Brain Activity & Our Five Senses
You may have heard at one point in your life that after death, brain activity continues for a period of time. This is true to some extent, though most of the postmortem brain activity is actually the brain making one last attempt to keep itself alive by using all the oxygen left inside the deceased body. In doing this, brain cells cause irreparable damage to themselves. consciousness can be retained for approximately 15-20 seconds following death- this is true even in the case of people who are decapitated. This short period of consciousness following death is most likely when your “life flashes before your eyes”. Although it is difficult to understand how a person may feel they are literally reliving their entire life in a matter of seconds, it’s very similar to how we perceive time in a dream. Have you ever fallen asleep and had a bizarre dream that felt like it lasted forever, only to realize you’d been sleeping for just a few minutes? That is most likely what is experienced by people who are dying, or having a near death experience. With brain activity continuing after death, our five senses slowly fade after death, as well. The first sense to go is sight, followed by taste, smell, touch and finally, hearing. That means even if you didn’t get a chance to say goodbye before your loved one passed, if you told them something shortly afterwards, they probably still heard it.

2. Post-Mortem Movement and Breathing
Just because your brain has died and all activity has ceased, that doesn’t mean your nervous system has stopped functioning entirely. Often corpses will retain reflex action, causing muscle twitches, spasms, even what appears to be shallow breathing (which is sure to turn anyone’s Wake into an exciting event). These movements are caused when nerves send signals to the spinal cord, but you might want to keep that to yourself and see if you can convince everyone at the Wake that your grandmother is turning into a zombie.

3. Skin
Skin cells do not need constant circulation to survive, which means they’ll outlive you by several days. Unfortunately, you won’t be able to grow and new skin cells, so any wounds you previously have or acquire during death will not heal. That means any tattoos, piercings, plastic surgery, microdermabrasion etc. that you were considering having don postmortem to look good for your last hoorah probably wont look as great as you may have imagined.

4. Hair and Nails Appear to Grow
…they don’t really, but it certainly looks that way. Same as your skin, no new hair or nail tissue will grow. A body begins to lose all its moisture following death. When all that water weight starts dropping off, you get a postmortem face lift. The pulling back and tightening of your skin from lack of moisture gives the appearance of hair and nail growth, when in actuality you are just shriveling up and shrinking.

5. Vocal Chords
When you die, the bacteria in your body that once digested your food begins eating you from the inside out. This causes a tremendous build-up of gasses inside your body which has to escape somehow. There are many ways in which these gasses evacuate the corpse, one of the less disturbing methods being through your windpipe… And yes, that is one of the less disturbing ways. It causes moans, groans, even squeaks to come from the deceased.

6. Pee/Poo/Farts
There is a common misconception that some people urinate when they die. Luckily, we’re here to dispel those kind of rumors; The truth is, almost everyone pees themselves when they die. The urinary sphincter is held shut by a part of your brain, so when your brain stops functioning, your sphincter opens up and everything left in your bladder at the time of death is released. After you die, if you gotta go well… You really gotta go because your brain is no longer able to “hold it”. If it helps ease your mind, you won’t necessarily “pee your pants”. Assuming you live a long life and die a natural death, this postmortem urine could very easily be collected by a catheter. Another misconception is that some people defecate one last time at the moment of death- this is just a flat out lie… Due to the fact that the bacteria in your body that digests food won’t begin eating you until all the food is gone, almost everyone poops for days following their death. Remember when I said there were many more disturbing ways built-up gas can escape a corpse? Pooping is one of them. Excess gasses often expel themselves through the anus, taking with them whatever is in their path… which is usually human waste. More commonly refered to as “poop”. The expulsion of gasses through the anus can also cause lots of postmortem farting. I think the disgusting child in all of us can appreciate the fact that even in death, we can (and will) fart up a storm in the coroner’s office.

7. Death Erections (and Ejaculations)
After all the blood in your system has stopped circulating, it begins to pool. The effects of this are most evident during the 4th stage of decomposition known as “Livor Mortis”, which you can learn all about here on The Post-Mortem Post on Thursday April 9th. All you need to know now is that after death blood pools in the lowest (in relation to the rest of the world) regions of the body. This means if you die standing up or laying face down, one place blood will pool is in the genitalia. When a male’s penis- living or dead fills with blood, it causes an erection. In the days of public hangings, when bodies were not always removed in a prompt and courteous manner, people became very familiar with the phenomenon of “death erections”, sported by many men who were hung to their death. During the 3rd phase of decomposition, Rigor Mortis (come back Wednesday April 8th to learn more) every muscle in the body begins to harden. The hardening causes contraction of the muscles and sometimes all that hardening and contracting can cause a corpse to ejaculate.

8. Coffin Birth
As we all know, pregnancy and childbirth used to be an incredibly dangerous experience for women. In a time before prenatal vitamins, ultrasounds and blood transfusions (with the correct type of blood) it was all too common for a woman to die during some stage of her pregnancy. Unfortunately, in those times, not everyone was able to receive a burial soon after death, or in some cases, ever. Due to this, there were a few rare accounts of women who had given birth, postmortem. These “Coffin Births”, as they became known, were caused by a combination of softening, deceased flesh and a build up of gasses within the cadaver. In some instances, this gas escaped through the vaginal canal of a female corpse, bringing a living, breathing baby out with it. Yes, you guessed it- the expulsion of postmortem gasses through the vaginal canal could also cause corpse queefs.

MYTH: In the late 1800s and early 1900s Optography was all the rage. Used as a plot device in many fictional murder mysteries at the time, it was also utilized in real-life crime solving. After Franz Christian Boll discovered rhodopsin, also known as “visual purple”, a photosensitive pigment in the retina which can be “fixed” similar to a photographic negative, German psychologist William Kuhne set to work researching how this could be helpful in solving crimes.There was a belief that an optogram could capture the last image seen before death on the retina of the deceased. This led investigators to believe they might have a shot at capturing an image of the killer in the eye of their victim. Kuhne did a lot of very mean, sad things to rabbits during his research that we do not condone and we don’t wanna talk about it… So instead we’ll jump to November 16, 1880 when William Kuhne finally got the shot to test this theory on a human eye. Erhard Gustav Reif was executed by guillotine after killing his children in Bruchsal. Immediately following his death, Reif’s eyes were extracted and sent to Kuhne to be analyzed. Kuhne found that on the left eye of Erhard Gustav Reif there was a vague outline of what appeared to be the guillotine blade.

Outline of optograph obtained from subject’s left retina.

This was a huge discovery in forensics… until people began to put two and two together and realized that the position in which Erhard Gustav Reif was placed at the time of his execution would not have made it possible for him to see the blade of the guillotine, not to mention he was blindfolded at the time. Despite the fact that is scientific reasoning to support how this theory would work… it just doesn’t, at least, not now. It is possible optography will be more thoroughly researched and one day, perfected as a method for solving murder.
Check out the NEW BOOK by The Post-Mortem Post’s Head Writer ‘Horrible History: Mass Suicides’ AVAILABLE NOW on Amazon Kindle!

If you enjoyed this article (or didn’t and want to know ways to minimize you postmortem farting and corpse queefs) you may like Burying the Dead is Killing the Planet, and Demystifying the Process of Dying.
Find out more about our upcoming Decomposition Week special.
Follow us on Twitter @PostMortem_post

Stage 2: Algor Mortis

The second stage of decomposition, Algor Mortis translates to “coldness” [algor] “of death” [mortis]. Algor Mortis, sometimes refered to as the “death chill”, is marked by a steady decline in body temperature and continues until the corpse reaches “ambient temperature”, or matches the temperature of its surroundings. Algor Mortis usually sets in one hour after death, but many factors have significant influence on this phase of decomposition. Determining the correct time of death by way of body temperature can be difficult due to stability/fluctuation of ambient temperature, the thermal conductivity of the surface the corpse is on and what is known as a “temperature plateau”, a highly variable period of time in which the body does not cool. The rate of cooling may be increased if the deceased is thin or malnourished or if the body is exposed to low temperatures and/or a windy environment. On the other hand, if the person was febrile (running a fever), under the influence, obese or left in a warm environment, the rate of cooling will decrease. Clothing can also play a major role in speeding up or slowing down Algor Mortis. The corpse will cool faster if large amounts of skin are exposed or when wearing wet clothing. Dry, layered, heavy clothing keeps the body warm for a longer period of time after death. Once the body begins true decomposition, the temperature will rise again, making Algor Mortis most helpful in determining time of death within the first 24 hours. Temperature readings can be obtained from the rectum of the deceased or by inserting a meat thermometer under the ribcage on the right side of the corpse and into the liver. Investigators use the Glaister Equation to estimate the time of death. While the temperature change can vary anywhere between a 1 degree Fahrenheit drop in temperature per hour to a 12 degree F drop per hour, the average is 1.5 degree F drop per hour, each hour following death. The Glaister Equation uses 98.4 degrees F (average body temperature) minus the rectal (or internal) temperature in degrees F, divided by 1.5 degrees F, to equate time of death. During this stage of decomposition, we also usually begin to see full corneal cloudiness in eyes which remained open after death.
Check out the NEW BOOK by The Post-Mortem Post’s Head Writer ‘Horrible History: Mass Suicides’ AVAILABLE NOW on Amazon Kindle!

Read about Stage 1: Pallor Mortis and Stage 3: Rigor Mortis
If you enjoyed this article, you may also like Everybody Poops: The Post-Mortem Edition and Demystifying the Process of Dying
Follow us on Twitter @PostMortem_post

Stage 3: Rigor Mortis

Corpse in morgue displays signs of Rigor Mortis

The third stage of decomposition known as “Rigor Mortis” translates to “stiffness” [rigor] “of death” [mortis]. The stiffness in a body during the phase of Rigor Mortis is caused by a build up of lactic acid which causes chemical changes within muscles. In life, lactic acid, also known as “milk acid” plays various roles in a body’s biochemical process. The myosin and actin (proteins involved in muscle movement) in the body then begin to harden, causing all muscles in the body to harden for a period of time, as well. At the time of death, “primary flaccidity” occurs and Rigor Mortis begins within 2-6 hours of death, starting with the eyelids, neck and jaw before spreading throughout the rest of the body over the following 4-6 hours. Sometimes all the hardening and contracting of muscles can cause an involuntary postmortem ejaculation in a male corpse. The exact onset and rate of completion of this stage is determined by many factors including age, gender, body type and muscle build; For instance, Rigor Mortis may not be perceivable in infants and children who lack muscle mass. Rigor Mortis may develop more quickly if cause of death is an infection, terminal seizure, electrocution or if the deceased has recently engaged in strenuous exercise or had a higher than average body temperature caused by fever, drugs or intoxication. Generally, 36-48 hours after death “secondary flaccidity” occurs when bacteria in the body begins eating away at the deceased from the inside out, causing the body to end Rigor Mortis and loosen again as muscle tissue begins to deteriorate. Sometimes, it can take 72 hours for the body to reach secondary flaccidity. In a warm environment, Rigor Mortis tends to dissipate sooner than average, whereas in a cold climate, the effects may persist longer.
Check out the NEW BOOK by The Post-Mortem Post’s Head Writer ‘Horrible History: Mass Suicides’ AVAILABLE NOW on Amazon Kindle!

Find out what happens prior to Rigor Mortis, Stage 1: Pallor Mortis and Stage 2: Algor Mortis and after Stage 4: Livor Mortis

Follow us on Twitter @PostMortem_post

If you enjoyed this article, you may also like Everybody Poops: The Post-Mortem Edition and Demystifying the Process of Dying

Evidence Supports Sixth Sense (PSI) in Humans

Today, many people claim to have extraordinary abilities, or a “sixth sense”: There are psychics who claim to know the future, mediums and spiritual sensitives who communicate with spirits of the dead, and telepaths who can read the minds of others, to name only a few. Unfortunately, “mediums” like Helen Duncan have caused the human race to lose all faith in people who claim to have “abilities”. When the “ectoplasm” that would manifest from her during séances so mysteriously began to take the form of a terrifyingly kitschy haunted house prop, her audiences were baffled. That was pretty short-lived once people caught on her “ectoplasm” was nothing more than cheesecloth. Since Helen, there have been dozens of high-profile frauds just like her. A couple of decades ago, it was mostly telephone psychics with late-night infomercials and regular slots on daytime TV talk shows. Now, with reality TV pumping out ghost investigation shows left and right, each one has their own resident psychic and/or medium, who is most likely just an actor. If you’ve seen ‘The Dead Files’ (which is an incredibly entertaining show on many levels, I must say), you’ve probably also seen “Physical Medium, Amy Allan”‘s camera man rolling his eyes at her in the background. Most recently, there’s been incredibly strong accusations of fraud surrounding mediums Theresa Caputo and Chip Coffey. When everyone you’ve ever known to claim these sort of abilities turns out to be a fraud, it is entirely logical to come to the conclusion that anyone who claims these abilities is a fraud. Unfortunately, the problem with that conclusion is, the real people with the real abilities will never go out on national television and start advertising it. They will never go up to perfect strangers in public and deliver a message from their deceased mother. For every John Edwards and Miss Cleo out there looking to make a quick buck running scams on the more vulnerable and naïve of us by assuring that a dead relative is happy in the afterlife, or that you can buy that house because you will get that new job, there are ten people with legitimate abilities who are not looking to make money off it. Usually, individuals who do sense spirits or future events try to suppress it. It’s not necessarily a pleasant ‘gift’, and the attention one would receive for such abilities would be incredibly overwhelming for most people. Think if it were you: You’re seeing things on a daily basis no one else can see, but could never possibly provide enough evidence to prove it- do you advertise that? No- you would end up in a psychiatric institute for the next several decades with your loved ones patronizing you for the rest of your existence. If you were aware of a massive terrorist attack that was about to take place, would you call up the government and inform them of all the details of the attack? No! Your house would be swarmed with Blackhawk helicopters ready to whisk you away to some secretive government prison in an unknown location for waterboarding. When normal people with everything to lose and no intention to gain anything (aside from information on what they are experiencing) claim to have extraordinary abilities, the least we can do is give them the benefit of the doubt and look into the possibility.
In 2010 social psychologist Daryl Bem, a professor emeritus at Cornell University conducted a series of nine experiments on 1,000 people to test the legitimacy of psychic abilities. In one of the experiments, participants were shown a list of words and asked to remember as many as possible. After students recalled all the words they could, a computer generated sort of words from the list were printed out. The students taking part in the study were asked to type the words on their list. Despite the fact that these words had been randomly chosen by a computer system after the word recall portion of the study was complete, the findings showed participants were better able to remember words which they would later type. Professor Bem believes these results were possible due to precognition. In another test performed, a separate group of students were shown an image of two curtains on a computer. They were told that one of the curtains would reveal an “adult” image. Although the image behind the curtain would not be generated until one curtain had been chosen, the participants chose the erotic image “more often than could be explained away by chance”, according to Daryl Bem. He believes the participants of his study were able to mentally manipulate which image would be revealed to them, after being given the suggestion the photo would be pornographic. Out of the nine experiments, all but one ruled in favor of psychic abilities, with a 74 billion to 1 chance the test results were a fluke. After reading about Bem’s astounding findings in The Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Professor Ritchie of Edinburgh recreated the experiments and received completely opposite results. Both professors agree, there is no explanation to the widely varied results of these two identical and in-depth experiments. Dr. Alan Hugenot is an architect/engineer and Naval Captain who claims a ‘believer’ and a ‘skeptic’ can conduct the same experiment and receive opposite results due to the way in which the two individuals perceive consciousness [Click this link for more on his theory]. In 1893, French sociologist Emile Durkheim first put forth the theory of a “shared mind” or “collective consciousness” [Click here for more info] Lyall Watson, a South African zoologist and ecologist, along with his colleague, scientific author Lawrence Blair, devised a theory in 1975 known as ‘The Hundredth Monkey Effect’ based on the findings of Japanese scientists. The scientists had observed macaques on the Japanese island of Koshima in the 1950s and found that once the group of macaques inhabiting the island learned how to wash sweet potatoes, the behavior spread to separate clan of macaques on a neighboring island, without the two groups having ever come into contact with one another. This same evidence of a collective consciousness has also been observed in a species of bird called the blue tit. In 2011, blue tits in Southampton discovered they could break into bottles and drink the milk inside from the top. Shortly afterwards, the exact same behavior occurred in different groups of the same species across Eurasia. Considering the fact that blue tits are non-migratory, there is absolutely no chance the groups exhibiting this behavior, spread so far apart, ever came into contact with each other. Surprisingly, this skill may also exist in humans. For instance, many astounding comparisons can be made between origin stories from religions practiced by separate groups of humans living great distances apart in ancient times. As far as historians and scientists know, these groups would not have had the ability to come into contact and share information. This phenomenon of species seemingly communicating new information telepathically could have a natural explanation. It is likely rather than literally using psychic abilities to pass on new techniques to the rest of the species, animals have uniform thought processes that solve problems in the exact same way as others of their own species. While this ability is not paranormal, it certainly is astounding and makes us wonder what other bizarre gifts nature may have given us that we have yet to acknowledge or utilize. Mother Nature has proven herself to be a creature of habit and Rupert Sheldrake has a theory that may offer an explanation as to why the behaviors of living beings in our universe seem to be constantly repeating themselves. Sheldrake is a biochemist, cell biologist, plant physiologist, and parapsychology researcher who believes not all memories are stored in our brain. He believes in an “extended mind” which stores a collective memory from all previous beings within the species that have come before, and is inherited by every new member of the species as a sort of self-preservation. Think of it as a type of evolved instinct- humans today are not doing quite as dumb things (as a whole) as they were 1,000 years ago. Not because anyone explicitly taught them not to, but because a part of us remembers from 1,000 years ago that we should not do that dumb thing anymore. Under this theory, the same would be true for tuna fish, okapi, red ants, chihuahuas, and every other living species that exists. It is a difficult theory for some to wrap their head around, but if you are a believer in reincarnation, it may make sense as an effect of living a lifetime, dying and being momentarily enlightened. When you return to Earth in a new life with only vague, subconscious fragments of your past life and between life experiences, perhaps this “extended mind” is a way to describe these leftover memories. As evidence to support his claim, Rupert Sheldrake cites the natural crystallization of new chemicals which crystallize very slowly the first time but become faster with each following attempt. According to him, the “Laws of Nature” are more like “Habits of Nature” that are expanded upon with each generation. It is a widely accepted fact that many animal species do possess a sixth sense and it is possible that it exists in humans, as well. The cryptochrome gene is a protein found in the retina of numerous animals such as butterflies, fruit flies, migratory birds, sea turtles, and foxes to name a few. Cryptochromes allow for accurate navigation in the dark because at the very least, the animal has an incredibly strong sense of the Earth’s magnetic field; However, it is likely some, if not all of these species have the ability to literally see the magnetic field laid out like a grid before them as clear as you can see your hand in front of your face. There is evidence supporting the theory that humans have this cryptochrome gene and the potential to tap into the abilities it provides. Unfortunately, scientists believe humans have lost all practical use for it due to the electromagnetic world we live in today. If you don’t use it, you lose it, and with modern computer apps, we have no need to use the mapping and navigation abilities nature has bestowed upon us. However, it does not necessarily suggest every single person in the world has completely lost every aspect of this ability. In fact, there are numerous “sixth senses” that only a select few members of the human race have retained, but may have, at one time, been present in a larger percentage. Perhaps many of the rare “sixth senses” that exist today will eventually evolve and be passed to future generations as a normal human function.
Take synesthesia for example: Synethstesia is a rare neurological condition or trait- no one really know exactly what causes it. It could be a defect in the neurological structure, cross-wiring in neurotransmitters, or possibly caused when a newborn’s body fails to properly “untangle” the part of the brain which analyzes our five senses. It tends to run in families, so it could even be a genetic disorder engrained in the synethstite’s DNA. Whatever the case may be, it gives the person the ability to see sounds, taste words, and hear physical feelings. Really, any combination of senses may be perceived in the brain of a person living with synesthesia. While there is no way to diagnose this condition, it exists in an estimated 4% of the population, in some form. The mixing of senses in a person with synesthesia is completely involuntary, it is experienced, not imagined. When someone with the condition hears the word “triangle”, they may see yellow because triangles are yellow and smell pears because triangles smell like pears. These associations will never change. “Triangle” will forever be yellow and smell like pears because to the synesthstite, that IS a triangle. Letters, numbers, weekdays, months, and other “common” words have a specific color and/or smell which comes in handy in helping these lucky individuals remember things. When trying to remember someone’s name, they may remember it was a dark purple name- “D” is dark purple- and the name smelled like chocolate chip cookies- names that end in a long “O” sound smell like chocolate chip cookies: The name was “Diego”. This may seem like an incredibly complicated way to remember a name, but someone experiencing synesthesia would think you’re an idiot for not being able to remember that Diego is dark purple and smells like cookies- DUH! Diego has always been dark purple and smelled like chocolate chip cookies, how could you not know that? Some people go through their entire lives with this condition, never realizing they are perceiving the world far differently from everyone else. I had gone my entire life (up until a few weeks ago) without realizing I have some form of synesthesia. I was under the impression everyone had specific, unwavering, colors, smells, or sounds they associated with certain things. From my own experience, I can assure you when I hear the word “death”, for instance, I smell a very distinct smell as though… Well, as though there actually were something there to smell. Although I do not know what the smell is, I know it smells puce green, which incidentally, is also the color of “death”. Puce green has always, and will always, smell like death: No exceptions. When I hear (or imagine the sound of) scraping on a chalkboard, I get a vivid, lingering metallic taste in my mouth as though I were sucking on a set of keys. It’s not anything I put thought or effort into, I just taste keys with no explanation as to why. Another incredibly bizarre “sixth sense” is the ability to see imaginary colors. Many people claim to see colors that do not exist within the color spectrum such as a blue-ish tinted yellow that is in no way similar to green. You may be doubting this is possible and wishing there were a way you find out for certain. Luckily, there’s a way to simulate this “imaginary color” phenomenon to decide for yourself if its legit: Imagine the color pink. Can you see it? Yes? …Are you aware pink is one of these imaginary colors? Although it is the only imaginary color everyone can see, it does not exist in the rainbow, and therefore, does not exist in the color spectrum at all. A rainbow is a representation of all colors present in the visible spectrum; Beginning, we have red, followed by orange, yellow, green, cyan, blue, and ending with violet. Our eyes have red, green, and blue light cones that decipher what shade we are seeing. When blue and green light mix, they create cyan, red and green light create yellow, every color we see is created by some combination of red, green and/or blue light- except pink. Pink is technically referred to as “magenta” (which is just a specific shade of pink for those of you not familiar with crayons) and magenta can only be created by mixing red light and violet light. If you were to take this horizontal color spectrum spanning from red to violet and visualize it curling up into a color wheel made up of colors in our visual spectrum, there would be a gap between red and violet. Everything to the side of red is an infrared form of light, everything to the side of violet is an ultraviolet form of light, due to this it is impossible for humans to visually mix red with violet. With our limited light cones unable to actually see magenta, our brain invents an imaginary color. Therefor, pink, magenta, wild strawberry, ‘mauvelous’, and any other catchy Crayola (TM) color that describes the hue created by red and violet is an imaginary color.
The human brain can achieve bizarre and amazing things. The world has recently learned two people can observe the same dress, but one person perceives a blue and black dress while another perceives it as white and gold. We can see imaginary colors, never questioning whether or not they are real, and some of us can vividly taste every color in the rainbow without ever opening a bag of Skittles. If some people’s brains can perceive sound when they observe a color, it’s not such a leap to assume there are humans who can hear the dead and see the future. Whether or not you’re sold on the idea of paranormal abilities being more normal than previously believed, leave here with this: Scientists know, without a doubt, it is absolutely possibly to predict the future, and deduce the past with 100% accuracy and they know how to do it. Our entire universe is composed of particles, due to this fact, if you knew the initial velocity (u), displacement (s), and acceleration (a) of every single particle in the universe, you could plug-in an amount of time (t) and know the future. Using the equation  s=ut + 1/2at^2  you would find the only place the particle can be at that exact moment in time and by knowing the exact position of every single particle in the universe, you will know the only possible future that can exist. Though some scientists dismiss parapsychology as pseudoscience, if we ignore the subject all together, we may never realize the human race’s full potential. At the very least, we can dismiss it and will certainly walk away with more knowledge on the paranormal (or lack thereof) than we have today. Scientists and intellectuals should strive to walk in the footsteps of the great Albert Einstein who believed, “To raise new questions, new possibilities… requires creative imagination and marks real advance in science.”.

If you enjoyed this article, [CLICK HERE] and [CLICK HERE] to learn more about these topics.
To learn more about Daryl Bem and read his entire article from The Journal of Personality and Social Psychology visit his website: http://dbem.ws/

Scientists Have Answered the Question: If a Tree Falls in the Forest, Does it Make a Sound?

For as long as humans have existed on the Earth, death has been mankind’s most wide-spread fear and it comes from a complete lack of understanding. The only thing we know for certain is that one day it will happen to everyone, despite anything we do to avoid it. Logic says otherwise, but some little piece of you wonders if you might retain some level of consciousness while your body undergoes an autopsy, is buried or cremated. No one is guaranteed a long life and peaceful death, even then there’s no assurance it won’t be painful. What if ghosts exist and you become one? Will you be reunited with all your loved ones in the afterlife or next life?
According to the theory of a biocentric universe, our knowledge of death may be so limited because it’s only an illusion to begin with. This idea was put forward in 2007 by biologist, Dr. Robert Lanza. Dr. Lanza is currently one of the leading scientists in the world and was named one of TIME Magazine’s 100 Most Influential People in the World in 2014. His biocentricism theory is based in quantum physics and claims life creates everything in the universe, as opposed to the universe creating all life inside it. His ideas also suggest space and time do not exist in any true sense, rather they are mental tools used by humans and animals to help make sense of the world around them. In the absence of space and time, it is impossible for death, in the way we know it, to exist. We picture living beings as having bodies, and because bodies do in fact die, we view the death of a body as an end of life. Lanza claims death is an illusion caused by our conscious acceptance of it as fact. He compares souls to perennial flowers: living and dying, only to come back again, without ever really leaving at all- just temporarily dormant between their life cycles. Biocentrism favors the multiverse theory, which states the universe we live in is one of many, and every possible outcome to every possible situation is taking place in one of the finite or infinite parallel universes contained within this multiverse. Therefor, even though we experience death in this universe, there is another universe in which our life continues. It all sounds very similar to the teachings of Joshiah, and entity who speaks through Bub Hill and claims to be from one of these parallel universes. Joshiah was featured in a previous article [click to open ‘Joshiah: We Are the Creators of Our Universe’ in a new page] as well as additional information regarding the multiverse theory. Could it really be possible that when we die we travel to another dimension where our life may continue, uninterrupted? Unfortunately, to reach a conclusion, someone would have to shoot themselves in the head no less than 22 times. You may have heard of quantum suicide, a hypothetical experiment that explores the possibility of a multiverse. In this mental experiment, a person is placed in a room with a gun held to their head. The gun would preferably be rigged to a probability generator to ensure each time the gun was fired, there would be a 50% chance it would go off, killing the participant, and a 50% chance nothing would happen. Following the initial pull of the trigger, the chance of survival would drop another 50% with each time. On the second pull there would be a 1 in 4 chance of survival, 1 in 8 on the third, and so on. By the 22nd shot, there would only be a 1 in 4,194,304 chance the participant would still be alive. At this point, scientists agree, the probability of survival would be so low that if the subjects has lived, it would be definitive proof of the multiverse. Unfortunately, even then only scientists in one universe would experience this outcome. Even if someone survived the 22nd shot, proving the existince of a multiverse, there is always a (highly unlikely) chance that the outcome would just be a fluke, or a “false positive”. With no way of knowing the whether or not the results are correct, without a doubt, there will always be die hard skeptics who will dismiss the evidence, and whoever was lucky enough to fire a gun at their head 22 times and live, would have done it all in vain. However, scientists can gain some insight into our universe by performing the quantum suicide experiment, mentally. For instance, it has been determined that as far as the experiment’s participant is concerned, no matter how many times the trigger is pulled, it will never release a bullet. To the observing scientists, the 50% chance of survival and 50% chance of death remains constant. Assuming the researchers were to witness the death of their participant during the experiment, the person firing the gun will only hear the click of an empty round. Regardless of the true outcome, the participant will always end up alive, in some reality, traveling through levels of the multiverse into a new demintion in which they continue to live, in the event of their perceived “death”. In the opinion of Dr. Robert Lanza, the way we observe the universe relies entirely on who is observing it. An example of this idea would be a colorblind person who knows “grass is green”. Although he or she understands it is “green”, the color being observed is completely different from what a person with normal vision would perceive as green. Still, there is no way to know whether individuals with “normal” vision observe all colors identically, or if we’ve only been taught to associate certain words with the color we do observe. My “green” could be more of a blue to you, whereas your “green” could be my pink. Evidence to support the theory that observation relies on the observer is demonstrated in the double-slit test. In this test, scientists shot a large number of individual particles through a solid object with two slits. A particle is a very tiny bit of matter, the substance that, as we understand it, comprises every solid object in our universe. Whatever you’re sitting on is matter, your computer is matter, you are matter. Imagine a particle as being a basketball- like any other solid, it needs an opening to pass through. When you try to get a basketball through the hoop, you will either succeed and the ball will pass through the opening at the bottom of the net, or the ball will hit the rim, bounce off,  and land outside the net. You know if the basketball hits the rim, it has to either go in the net or not. It is impossible for the solid ball to pass through the solid rim, allowing the ball to land inside and outside of the net, simultaneously… or is it? When scientists conducted an experiment on this same basic idea, using many individual particles (tiny bits of matter), their results were astounding. When many particles are shot at another solid object containing a small slit, they should leave a sort of residue behind in the form of a line. This line is a visual imprint of the area the particles passed through. Its comparable to painting over a stencil of an “A”. If done correctly, when the stencil is removed, the painting surface should reveal a copy of the “A” cut out of the stencil, and nothing more. When this experiment is done with two slits, there should be two of these lines created by particles. Some of the particles will choose to go in the first slit, others will choose to go in the second, with these two slits being the only locations to exit. Astoundingly, when scientists viewed their results, they found residue which appeared more like a barcode (many lines of varying sizes). This means the particles traveled in a way which is impossible for matter to travel- they traveled in two waves. It was proof that each individual particle had traveled through both slits simultaneously. Finding this incredibly peculiar, the experiment was carried out again and again. Finally, a device was used to measure the movement of the particles and determine exactly which slit they were going through, or how they were able to move through both at once. Scientists discovered, when observed, the particle was forced to make a decision, causing the particles to create two lines of residue as had been expected of them in each previous experimentation. In continuing research, it was found that if the particles were under observation, they behaved as a particle, but if their activity went unobserved, they behaved as a wave. The results prove matter can act as either a wave or a particle, based on what our consciousness perceives them to be. Once again, this should absolutely not be possible, and it is a very strong piece of evidence in support of the theory that the universe behaves as it does, simply because we observe it. The double-spilt test has answered the age old question, “If a tree falls in the forest, and no one is around, does it make a sound?” with, “Only if it wants to.”.
Dr. Allen Hugenot believes this fact may even influence the outcome of scientific experiments. Hugenot is an architect/engineer and Naval Captain who claims a ‘believer’ and a ‘skeptic’ can conduct the same experiment and receive opposite results due to the way in which the two individuals perceive consciousness. One instance of this can be seen in the case of Professor Daryl Bem, a ‘believer’, who in 2010 conducted an experiment to test the legitimacy of phsychic abilities. His results concluded, without a doubt, information can be shared by way of a collective consciousness. Afterwards, a ‘skeptical’ professor replicated Bem’s tests, this time producting opposite results. According to both professors, there is no way to explain the incredibly varied outcome of the two identical and in-depth experiments. [click here to learn more about Daryl Bem’s experiment] Hugenot, who experienced a near death experience in the 1970s claims the place he went was, “more real than this place” and believes all of human consciousness, every piece of knowledge that exists in the universe is stored in “The Cloud”. If youre picturing the virtual “Cloud” where data can be stored, downloaded onto any device, the place all celebrity’s nude photos come from, then you’re on the right track. Hugenot’s Cloud is basically the same, only your soul is stored there along with every other living being’s… So really, its exactly the same. He believes when a person suffers a near death event, they go to The Cloud to escape whatever trauma they are experiencing. This idea lines up with stories of many people who claim to recall past lives and/or between-lives. One of them is Cade, [read his story in its entirety in a new window by clicking here] a boy who remembers his death in the 9/11 attacks on the World Trade Centers. He insists our souls are huge, dark, swirling masses that reach out to the sky, and come out the top of our head’s in what can best be described as a funnel cloud, of sorts. Dr. Hugenot is convinced this Cloud exists somewhere within dark matter or dark energy, which accounts for up to 96% of our universe. But what exactly are dark matter and dark energy? No one knows. In fact, we only are aware it exists because of the gravitational effects it has on the tiny, 4% of our universe we have the ability to observe. We know it does exist and we know it isn’t just baryonic matter. Baryonic matter is just the good old fashioned matter we all know and love (or thought we knew until we found out about its little double-split incident), its able to emit and absorb light. Dark matter cannot; However, it can scatter light from nearby stars, which scientists believes causes a “glowing” effect we can see surrounding most galaxies. Unfortunately, there is no way to be certain if this is caused by dark matter, or other sources in space. In the 1930’s Fritz Zwicky began measuring how the galaxies move. He found the galaxies should not be moving the way they were unless the universe contained more mass than scientists were aware existed- a lot more mass. You see, the less mass there is, the less gravity. All the baryonic mass we can understand with our five senses that exists in the universe only accounts for 15% of the gravity in our universe. The remaining 85% is left entirely unexplained. Fortunately for all life on Earth and anywhere else, dark matter is there as the illusive glue that keeps our universe intact. Dark matter has also been observed through the Bullet Cluster, two galaxies which were pulled together by gravity. Galaxy clusters contain 100,000,000 degree gasses which account for most of the mass within the galaxies. Without mass produced by these gasses, there would not be enough gravity to keep the stars in the galaxy in place. When the two galaxies we refer to as “The Bullet Cluster” collided millions of years ago, their two gas clouds became one. So much friction was created when the two dense pockets of gas came in contact with one another that their motion slowed significantly. Surprisingly, the stars in the two galaxies, which should have slowed down as well, traveling with the gas, just kept going. When all was said and done, the enormous single gas cloud remained in the middle, while the two galaxies ended up on either side of the gas. In theory, the galaxies need this gas surrounding them to remain in tact. Due to the fact that the galaxies did remain in tact, void of their gasses, we know there has to be some other form of mass out there creating gravity to hold the galaxies together: Dark matter. In the 1990s, astronomers understood our universe is expanding, which left us two options: the universe is so dense it will one day stop expanding and collapse, or “crunch”, which will kill all life in a giant, fiery implosion or, its not so very dense and will go on expanding, eventually slowing due to gravity, and we will all freeze in an ice age of apocalyptic proportions. When scientists decided to research which horrible end all life on our Earth will meet, they learned our universe is not slowing in its expansion, its accelerating. The baryonic mass in the universe wants to be together. If two planets, stars or galaxies (or in the case of the Andromeda Galaxy and Earth, a galaxy and a planet) come too close to one another, their gravitational pull will cause a collision. The only way to make sense of this accelerating expansion of the universe is with dark energy. Today, the general belief is that dark energy and baryonic matter repel one another, and we have dark energy to thank for the peace of mind that our universe is rapidly accelerating in its expansion and as far as we know, will not be coming to an end anytime in the foreseeable future (which in science, is several billion years).
The universe we live in was born about 14 billion years ago in an event known as, “The Big Bang”. As far as we know, before, there was nothing. If all observations really are dependent on an observer, who observed The Big Bang? When presented with this question, Alan Hugenot replied, “Consciousness, man”, took a huge rip from a bong, and returned to his research. In all seriousness, it is possible “God” is just a personification of all human consciousness, which created our universe in the beginning and continues to expand upon it today.

Learn more about Dr. Robert Lanza and his research
Learn more about Dr. Alan Hugenot and his research
Learn more about Daryl Bem and his research

If you enjoyed this article, [CLICK HERE] to learn more about these topics.